| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
273
   |
Posted - 2012.12.11 13:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
edit: ugh eve-o ate my post give me a few minutes
Follow me on twitter |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
282
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 15:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
You're acting like it's a war on hisec, I don't care where people play. The current Risk vs. Reward right now is hilariously and stupidly broken. The Risk vs. Reward ratio needs to be redone
Follow me on twitter |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
282
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 15:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Codie Dunier wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Randolph Rothstein wrote:i like high sec ,why should i leave it? You shouldn't. As long as you accept the consequences of that choice (ie lower rewards for some actions, which is who it should work be sometimes doesn't), I've got no problem with it. It's the people who want to have their cake (safety) and Eat it too (profits, content, "fun" ) that i have a problem with. So... you have a problem with me living in high-sec, because it's the safest place to run missions, and because I find missions with corp-mates to be fun after the NPCs got a crash course in strategy? What's wrong with having "Safety" and "Fun" at the same time? I seriously couldn't care less about if CCP reduced NPC-Bounties to 75% of what they are now. I'd still do the missions because I think they're fun.
NO ONE HAS A PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE IN HISEC GET OVER THIS PERSECUTION COMPLEX
What people have a problem with is that a player with no risk will make just as much money (if not more) vs a player who will make the same (or less) with everything to risk. The balance is just dumb in this regard.
Follow me on twitter |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
282
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 15:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
Randolph Rothstein wrote:HVAC Repairman wrote:
What people have a problem with is that a player with no risk will make just as much money (if not more) vs a player who will make the same (or less) with everything to risk. The balance is just dumb in this regard.
but if eve is sandbox why dont you make iskmaking in highsec more dangerous?you can do it yeah you will loose a lot of ships,but thats the risk - are you willing to take it? if not why should i take risk flying to lowsec?
You're confusing what a sandbox MMO is and what a game mechanic is
Follow me on twitter |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
284
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 16:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
The "unhappy nullsec guy" is another such lie. .
Maybe in your experiences, but I had to listen to such BS about the evils of the "Hi Sec carebear" from whinny Null Sec warriors on TS on many Alliance roams over the years. I enjoy all parts of the game, Null Sec, Low Sec, and Hi Sec; but I can't stand it when people blame others for their lack of enjoyment of the game. The whinny Null Sec Warrior is the worse offender in this regard at this time, in my opinion. They are the ones who seem to want to force more players into Low and Null, by consistently trying to get content moved there from Hi Sec.
This is completely wrong.
One, you're pulling the persecution card. No one cares where you play.
Two, no one is forcing anyone anywhere. Providing an incentive to go elsewhere, yes. Balancing the risk and reward, yes. Magically transporting every hisec player to null, low, and wormhole space and closing all the stargates to hisec, no.
Three, no one is even saying that hisec needs to be nerfed. Null and Low's issues could theoretically be fixed by straight buffs. But right now, as it stands, the risk vs. reward ratio is hilariously stupid in every possible way.
Follow me on twitter |
| |
|